It all started with Ronald Reagan (see chart). The National Debt as a percentage of GNP had steadily declined since Truman, reaching its lowest point to around 30% of GDP in 1981 when Reagan first took office. At the end of the Reagan/Bush Administrations it had reached a high of nearly 70% of GDP and four times as large as when Reagan came to power. The Clinton Administration reversed this upward trend of increasing National Debt, and brought it down to less than 60% and promising Budget Surpluses ‘as far as the eye could see’. Thanks to another Republican Administration of George W. Bush this was once again reversed with Budget Deficits now ‘as far as the eye can see’. George W. has managed to top even Reagan’s ‘golden years’ of more government spending and even lower taxes for the rich. So what happened to the Republican Fiscal Conservative Ideology? What happened to the endless calls for a Balanced Budget Amendment? Were these nothing more than political ploys to win elections, just like similar calls for Term Limits and Line Item Vetoes? Yes and no. No doubt Republicans used such hot button issues to win elections and power. But I believe the National Debt and Budget Deficits (along with Lower Taxes) have become key parts of the ‘new’ New Right. It’s not the Deficit, stupid! It’s Lower Taxes for the Rich! has become the new mantra of Republican Administrations.
So why Republican Administrations love Budget Deficits? Budget Deficits reflect an imbalance between Government Spending and Government Revenues. Deficits means lower taxes for the rich, as well as government guaranteed Treasury Notes for their secure long-term investments. Budget Deficits in effect hock the Future of our country to the rich and powerful. Budget Deficits over time also help dismantle and divest Government programs and weaken the Government’s ability to help ordinary people. It is Gingrich’s ‘wither on the vine’ proposal for Social Security and Medicare. By making Government small and powerless to help people improve their lives, it gives those that already have wealth and power more wealth and power. It tilts the playing field even more in favor of the rich who can buy the best education, have the best health care, best neighborhoods to raise their families in safety, deregulated investments and businesses, etc. The divide between the rich and the rest is wider and wider. Lower taxes aim to ‘protect the rich’ while Republican political rhetoric seeks to ‘blame the poor’ — as if ‘individual responsibility’ alone is the cause of their plight and the solution to their problems. Republican laws and policies have redefined America, leaving most ordinary Americans behind without a country. America is no longer defined by its geographical boundaries or citizenship, but by the laws that protect the powerful special interests (domestic or foreign) that Government serves. No wonder ‘border security’ has become an oxymoron for the ‘new’ New Right!

9 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 10, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Bush-McCain’s “Bridge to Nowhere”: no jobs, no health care, no energy, no college, no home, no hope! « The Political Dispatch
[...] September 10, 2008 in Uncategorized | Tags: Add new tag, Republican Administrations, McCain-Bush, presidential election campaign 2008, Obama, Sarah Palin, Bridge to Nowhere, Budget Deficits, “thanks but no thanks”, McCain’s Bridge to Nowhere, Presidential Elections | We’ve heard much lately of “the bridge to nowhere” from Sarah Palin and her Republican handlers. This is a bridge sponsored by Republican Congressmen and backed initially by Sarah Palin herself, that was never build! But the hundreds of millions of dollars allocated for it was spend nonetheless! Sarah Palin’s “bridge to nowhere” is a perfect metaphor of the Bush-McCain Republican Party. They spend billions of dollars of our money (trillions in national debt) and the people’s business is never built. (”Why Republican Administrations Love Budget Deficits!”) [...]
September 18, 2008 at 8:36 pm
McCain: Out of Touch and Out of Mind on the Economy « The Political Dispatch
[...] give the excessive rich more excessive tax cuts and perpetuate the same policies as Bush’s Republican Party? Something is wrong with this picture! The “emperor is naked” and no amount of [...]
September 18, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Wall Street Meltdown and the Collapsing Middle Class « The Political Dispatch
[...] Obama’s policies! And this is the Change that America needs – not more of the same bankrupt Republican Ideology of Greed proposed by Bush’s act-alike. [...]
September 22, 2008 at 3:56 am
Republican Infallibility and Democratic Failures « The Political Dispatch
[...] 22, 2008 in Uncategorized The Teflon Presidency of Ronald Reagan (”Why do Republican Administrations Love Budget Deficits?”) has created a political Frankenstein monster: the present-day Republican Party of Bush and McCain. [...]
September 27, 2008 at 10:00 pm
McCain’s Dream our National Nightmare « The Political Dispatch
[...] September 27, 2008 in Uncategorized | Tags: bailout plan, House Republican’s, John Boehener, McCain’s Dream, national crisis, National Nightmare, Obama, presidential election, rush to Washington, Wall Street meltdown, White House meeting During a national emergency the country must come together to act as one and leave politics aside. The President and his Treasury Secretary tell us we have such a national emergency with the meltdown that’s occurring of our financial institutions. They have proposed a Rescue Plan to save our Economy and failure to act quickly we’re told will have severe and dire consequences for everyone. The Senate and House Democrats have acted quickly to flesh out Secretary Paulson’s $700 billion Rescue Plan with reasonable safeguards to help ensure the plan will succeed and the taxpayers are protected. But House Republicans, in cohorts with John McCain (”McCain’s Choice: Politics Before Country”) have derailed the delicate negotiations and sought in this crisis a new opportunity to further their political ambitions. Unexpectedly at the White House meeting they put forth a counter-plan that would let market forces and private interests (the same unregulated profit motives that led us into this mess) solve this crisis. They also propose more tax cuts for corporations, further making any final agreement that much more difficult. They are willing to use any means and any crisis to further their extreme ideology of less government, less regulation, and more tax cuts for the rich. (”Why Do Republican Administrations Love Budget Deficits?”). [...]
October 3, 2008 at 4:57 pm
Obama vs. McCain? Not Really! « The Political Dispatch
[...] 90’s show that Democrats are better in managing our national economy. It makes sense (”Why do Republican Administrations love Budget Deficits?”). With a balanced budget and low national debt government is in a better position to help [...]
October 15, 2008 at 9:24 pm
Free Markets and Forest Fires « The Political Dispatch
[...] politics when combined with Religious Fundamentalism is a dangerous and explosive mixture (”Why do Republican Administrations love Budget Deficits?“). Political IED’s thrown in the Halls of Congress in the name of Conservative Ideology [...]
October 26, 2008 at 8:09 pm
The Fallacy of Higher Taxes and Job Lose « The Political Dispatch
[...] Republican Administration used the Clinton’s Budget Surplus for tax cuts to the rich (”Why do Republican Administrations Love Budget Deficits?”). That’s what recent history teaches us. But the fallacy does not stop [...]
August 25, 2009 at 5:08 pm
How to Kill Health Care Reform! « The Political Dispatch
[...] When will the Democrats learn the “politics of surge” that worked well for the Republicans (”Republican Infallibility and Democratic Failures”). You never admit defeat, you never admit weakness, you spin polls and public opinion, you assume an election mandate, even when you lost the popular vote and are voted in by the politicized Supreme Court, and you do it with any means you can and not necessarily with bipartisanship. That’s the recipe for political success in Washington, e.g. the Bush Tax Cut for the wealthy that squandered Clinton’s ‘budget surplussed as far as the eye could see’. (”Why Do Republican Administrations Love Budget Deficits?”). [...]